The controversy surrounding the Rivers State emergency rule bears a striking resemblance to the 1962 political crisis in Nigeria’s Western Region. That year, internal conflicts within the ruling Action Group escalated into a national emergency, leading to the suspension of the regional government by the Federal Parliament.
Legal Experts Challenge Suspension of Governor, Lawmakers
Abuja, Nigeria – The recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State has ignited a heated constitutional debate, with legal experts questioning the legality of suspending the governor, his deputy, and the state legislature.
Citing Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which empowers the president to declare a state of emergency under specific circumstances, critics argue that there is no constitutional basis for the suspension of elected officials.
A legal analyst noted, “The only ways a governor can be removed from office are through resignation, impeachment by the legislature, death, loss of re-election, expiration of tenure, or permanent incapacitation. Nowhere in the Constitution is the president granted the authority to ‘suspend’ a governor or legislature during an emergency.”
As a result, concerned parties are being urged to challenge the decision at the Supreme Court, with some legal minds arguing that the ruling could set a critical precedent for Nigeria’s democracy.
Tinubu’s Past Criticism of Emergency Rule Resurfaces
Interestingly, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s current use of emergency powers contrasts sharply with his previous stance. As the leader of the now-defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Tinubu had strongly opposed former President Goodluck Jonathan’s use of emergency rule, calling it a “dangerous trend in governance.”
At the time, he warned that such measures could alienate citizens and exacerbate tensions rather than restore peace. This shift in approach has fueled discussions about the political undertones of the Rivers State emergency declaration.
Historical Precedent: The 1962 Western Region Crisis
The controversy surrounding the Rivers State emergency rule bears a striking resemblance to the 1962 political crisis in Nigeria’s Western Region. That year, internal conflicts within the ruling Action Group escalated into a national emergency, leading to the suspension of the regional government by the Federal Parliament.
At the heart of the crisis was a power struggle between the party’s leader, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, and the Premier of the Western Region, Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola. As tensions boiled over, violent clashes erupted in the Western House of Assembly, forcing federal authorities to intervene.
On May 29, 1962, Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa convened an emergency session of Parliament, where he justified the intervention, stating:
“No responsible government can allow such an explosive situation to continue without taking adequate measures to ensure peace, order, and good governance.”
The Western Region was subsequently placed under emergency rule, with a temporary administrator appointed to govern in place of elected officials.
Parallels and Concerns
While the circumstances differ, observers note striking similarities between the 1962 Western Region crisis and the current situation in Rivers State. In both cases, political disputes escalated into governance crises, leading to federal intervention. However, constitutional scholars argue that the outright suspension of elected officials in Rivers State lacks legal backing, unlike the 1962 case, where Parliament acted in line with the law at the time.
Critics warn that if this precedent stands, future administrations may exploit emergency rule to undermine democratic institutions. They argue that Nigeria must strike a delicate balance between maintaining public order and upholding constitutional democracy.
As legal challenges loom, all eyes will be on the Supreme Court to determine the fate of Rivers State’s political leadership and the broader implications for Nigeria’s democratic future.
Join our Channel...