Why LG autonomy cannot work – ekiti former Governor, Fayose

Ekiti State Former Governor, Ayo Fayose, has expressed concerns over the Supreme Court’s recent judgment granting local governments the right to receive monthly allocations directly from the federation account. However, he believes that this autonomy will be hindered by state Houses of Assembly and governors.

According to Fayose, no one can emerge as a local government chairman without the support of a governor. He emphasized that the court judgment will not change the dynamics at play, as governors will continue to exert influence over local governments.

Fayose, a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), made these remarks during an appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today. He argued that while the idea of direct allocation to local governments might be appealing, it is unrealistic given the current system.

In his view, local government chairmen cannot function independently without the backing of their governors. He cited the example of how local government workers often neglect their duties, with some not bothering to come to work on certain days of the week. Fayose also highlighted the role of state Houses of Assembly in regulating local government activities, making it difficult for chairmen to operate without gubernatorial support.

The former governor noted that governors have more influence over local governments than many people realize. He stated that even if a local government chairman decides to disregard their governor’s directives, state lawmakers will intervene to bring them back in line. Fayose also pointed out that governors play a crucial role in facilitating appointments and appointments in local governments, making it difficult for chairmen to operate without their blessing.

Despite his reservations about the Supreme Court’s judgment, Fayose acknowledged that it is essential for governments at all levels to ensure transparency and accountability in financial transactions. He stressed that nobody wants to see funds meant for development being mismanaged or diverted.

Ultimately, Fayose believes that the current system may not change significantly despite the court’s decision, as governors and state Houses of Assembly will continue to exert influence over local governments.