Atiku had suggested this change would curb wastage from four-year periodic elections and ensure inclusive governance.
Abuja, Nigeria – Former Vice President and 2023 presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar has expressed disappointment over the House of Representatives’ rejection of a bill proposing a six-year single term for presidents and governors.
The bill, sponsored by Ikenga Ugochinyere and 33 others, aimed to alter sections 76, 116, 132, and 136 of the 1999 Constitution.
Atiku’s Media Adviser, Paul Ibe, described the rejection as “sad” and emphasized that Nigeria is at a crossroads. He argued that the proposed amendment would have strengthened the polity, allowed elected officials to focus on governance without distraction, and promoted the well-being of Nigerians.
Key Provisions of the Rejected Bill:
- Six-Year Single Term: Presidents and governors would serve a single six-year term.
- Rotating Presidency: The presidency would rotate between the North and South regions every six years.
- Simultaneous Elections: All elections for president, governors, National Assembly, and state Houses of Assembly would hold on the same date.
- Succession Plan: If a president-elect dies or is unable to take office, the vice president would be sworn in and appoint a new vice president.
- Term Limitation: Governors completing another person’s term would not be eligible for election to the same office.
The bill was rejected in a voice vote during Thursday’s plenary session, despite Atiku’s earlier proposal for a constitutional amendment to establish a six-year single term. Atiku had suggested this change would curb wastage from four-year periodic elections and ensure inclusive governance.
The former Vice President’s team hopes the House of Representatives will revisit the proposal, realizing their “mistake” The rejection has sparked debate on the potential benefits and drawbacks of a six-year single term for presidents and governors in Nigeria.
Join our Channel...